<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
>
<channel>
<title>Cannabis Legislation Archives — Black Cannabis Magazine</title>
<atom:link href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/tag/cannabis-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/tag/cannabis-legislation/</link>
<description>We educate, inform, empower + provide entertainment for our TRIBE. Highlighting people of color in the cannabis industry.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>
hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>
1 </sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">169930730</site> <item>
<title>Florida Bill SB 334: Homegrow Legal but Hemp Products Banned</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-bill-sb-334-homegrow-legal-but-hemp-products-banned/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-bill-sb-334-homegrow-legal-but-hemp-products-banned/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis homegrow]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis regulations]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Florida cannabis law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Florida marijuana law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[hemp ban]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[hemp industry]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[hemp restrictions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Home Cultivation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[SB 334]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199876</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Florida’s cannabis industry is facing a mixed bag of developments with Senate Bill 334 (SB 334), which aims to legalize limited home cultivation of cannabis for personal use while simultaneously imposing stringent restrictions on hemp products. The bill, effective July 1, 2025, has sparked a heated debate among cannabis advocates, patients, and industry stakeholders. Here’s […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-bill-sb-334-homegrow-legal-but-hemp-products-banned/">Florida Bill SB 334: Homegrow Legal but Hemp Products Banned</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida’s cannabis industry is facing a mixed bag of developments with <a href="https://m.flsenate.gov/session/bill/2025/334/billtext/__/pdf">Senate Bill 334 (SB 334)</a>, which aims to legalize limited home cultivation of cannabis for personal use while simultaneously imposing stringent restrictions on hemp products. The bill, effective July 1, 2025, has sparked a heated debate among cannabis advocates, patients, and industry stakeholders. Here’s what you need to know about the proposed legislation.</p>
<h3><strong>Homegrow Legalization for Medical Cannabis Patients</strong></h3>
<p>SB 334 introduces a provision allowing qualified medical cannabis patients aged 21 and older to cultivate up to <strong>two cannabis plants per household</strong>. However, this seemingly patient-friendly move comes with heavy state oversight:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Certification Required:</strong> Patients must obtain a certificate from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, which will include registering and inspecting each plant.</li>
<li><strong>Inspections:</strong> Plants are subject to random state inspections, adding another layer of regulation.</li>
<li><strong>Cultivation Limits:</strong> Even if multiple qualified patients live in the same household, the limit is capped at two plants total.</li>
<li><strong>Privacy Requirements:</strong> Cultivation must occur in a secure, enclosed space, not visible from public view.</li>
<li><strong>Landlord Consent:</strong> Patients in rental housing must provide written landlord approval before cultivating plants.</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Sweeping Hemp Product Bans</strong></h3>
<p>The hemp industry in Florida will face severe limitations under SB 334, with some provisions likely to dismantle much of the current market. Here’s what the bill entails:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Banned Cannabinoids and Derivatives:</strong><br />
SB 334 explicitly bans the manufacture, sale, and possession of several cannabinoids and their derivatives, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>THCA (Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid)</li>
<li>THCV (Tetrahydrocannabivarin)</li>
<li>THCP (Tetrahydrocannabiphorol)</li>
<li>THC-O (THC Acetate Ester)</li>
<li>Delta-8 and Delta-10 THC</li>
<li>Any other “THC derivative or isomer.”</li>
</ul>
<p>The ban extends to any form of hemp that is smokable or could be considered attractive to children, including edibles with vibrant packaging or candy-like shapes.</li>
<li><strong>Packaging and Testing Regulations:</strong><br />
The bill enforces stricter guidelines for packaging, labeling, and product testing. Hemp products must meet heightened testing standards, including testing for contaminants and adherence to strict THC concentration limits.</li>
<li><strong>Surviving Cannabinoids:</strong><br />
Only CBD, CBD-A (Cannabidiolic Acid), and CBN (Cannabinol) will remain legal, effectively shrinking the available market for hemp-derived products. However, even these cannabinoids face tight advertising restrictions.</li>
<li><strong>Advertising Restrictions:</strong><br />
Hemp businesses cannot advertise products in any manner visible from public streets, sidewalks, parks, or other public spaces. Terms like “THC” are explicitly banned in advertising, and businesses must obtain prior state approval for all advertisements.</li>
<li><strong>Prohibited Sales Channels:</strong>
<ul>
<li>No hemp products can be sold at unlicensed venues, street festivals, or temporary stalls.</li>
<li>Street vending is explicitly prohibited.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Recordkeeping Requirements:</strong><br />
Businesses must maintain detailed records for three years, including lab testing results and supplier documentation, subject to random state audits.</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Increased Regulatory Scrutiny</strong></h3>
<p>Businesses selling hemp products will face random inspections from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Non-compliance with packaging, recordkeeping, or advertising requirements could lead to penalties, including stop-sale orders and license revocations.</p>
<h3><strong>Industry and Community Reactions</strong></h3>
<p>The bill has drawn sharp criticism from hemp farmers, retailers, and consumer advocacy groups. They argue that these restrictions unfairly target the hemp industry, which has provided legal, low-THC alternatives for consumers who do not qualify for medical cannabis. Many fear the <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/desantis-vetoes-florida-bill-to-ban-delta-8-and-hemp-products/">ban on smokable hemp</a> and the new THC caps could devastate small businesses while driving consumers toward the unregulated market.</p>
<p>On the other hand, proponents of the legislation emphasize the need for stricter controls to prevent the misuse of hemp-derived products, particularly among minors. They also highlight the safety benefits of regulating product quality through stringent testing and labeling requirements.</p>
<h3><strong>The Bigger Picture</strong></h3>
<p>SB 334 reflects Florida’s complex relationship with cannabis and hemp regulation. While the legalization of limited homegrow for medical cannabis patients is a step forward, the aggressive clampdown on hemp products underscores the ongoing tensions between the state’s medical cannabis and hemp industries. As the July 2025 implementation date approaches, the cannabis community will undoubtedly continue to advocate for revisions to the bill to balance consumer access, industry growth, and public safety.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-bill-sb-334-homegrow-legal-but-hemp-products-banned/">Florida Bill SB 334: Homegrow Legal but Hemp Products Banned</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-bill-sb-334-homegrow-legal-but-hemp-products-banned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199876</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Louisiana THC Law Brings Big Changes for Businesses in 2025</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-thc-law-brings-big-changes-for-businesses-in-2025/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-thc-law-brings-big-changes-for-businesses-in-2025/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[hemp industry]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Louisiana hemp]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Louisiana THC law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[THC products]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[THC regulations]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199824</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As Louisiana prepares to enforce stricter THC regulations starting January 1, 2025, businesses in the hemp industry are scrambling to adapt. The new law imposes tighter potency limits on THC products and significantly restricts where they can be sold. Local retailers are holding major sales to clear non-compliant inventory, while producers weigh the viability of […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-thc-law-brings-big-changes-for-businesses-in-2025/">Louisiana THC Law Brings Big Changes for Businesses in 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Louisiana prepares to enforce stricter THC regulations starting January 1, 2025, businesses in the hemp industry are scrambling to adapt. The <a href="https://legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=246397">new law</a> imposes tighter potency limits on THC products and significantly restricts where they can be sold. Local retailers are holding major sales to clear non-compliant inventory, while producers weigh the viability of operating in the state under the new rules.</p>
<h3><strong>Retailers Rush to Adapt</strong></h3>
<p>Under the updated regulations, the potency of THC in hemp-derived products will drop from 8 mg to 5 mg per serving. Additionally, the law imposes packaging limitations for edibles and beverages. These changes have sent retailers like Simply Cannabis on Magazine Street into overdrive.</p>
<p>“We’re running sales until the first,” said Collin Avrard, General Manager of Simply Cannabis. “We’re preparing for the worst from the state just because the regulations are so heavy.”</p>
<p>High-potency products, which drive sales due to their efficiency and popularity, will no longer meet legal standards, leaving retailers scrambling to clear their shelves.</p>
<h3><strong>Producers Face Tough Decisions</strong></h3>
<p>The new law is equally challenging for THC product manufacturers. Crescent Canna, known for its Crescent 9 THC Seltzer, is grappling with whether to reformulate its products or pull out of Louisiana altogether.</p>
<p>“It’s completely impossible to exist as a company when every year you’re fighting for your life with legislators who don’t understand what they are doing and don’t care to hear your opinions,” said CEO Joe Gerrity.</p>
<p><strong>Key product restrictions include:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>THC Beverages:</strong> Maximum 5 mg THC per serving, with each serving at least 12 fl oz. Only one serving is allowed per container, and packages are limited to four containers.</li>
<li><strong>THC Edibles:</strong> Maximum 5 mg THC per piece, with no more than 40 mg THC per package. For example, an eight-pack of 5 mg gummies is the highest potency allowed.</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Restrictions on Sales Locations</strong></h3>
<p>The law also reduces access to THC products by banning certain retail locations from selling them.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bars and Restaurants:</strong> Only bars and restaurants with existing hemp permits can continue selling THC beverages. No new permits will be issued.</li>
<li><strong>Gas Stations:</strong> Starting January 1, 2025, gas stations will no longer carry hemp-derived products. However, truck stops are exempt from this restriction.</li>
</ul>
<p>These rules create confusion for businesses and consumers alike, leaving some questioning the logic behind the distinctions.</p>
<h3><strong>Industry Concerns</strong></h3>
<p>The law’s financial and operational impacts on businesses are significant. Retailers must educate customers on what products will no longer be available, while producers face the possibility of layoffs or exiting the <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-decriminalizes-paraphernalia-cannabis-pardons-await-governor/">Louisiana market</a>.</p>
<p>For many, the broader concern is the chilling effect such regulations could have on the hemp industry in Louisiana. Restrictive laws deter innovation, discourage investment, and limit consumer choices, ultimately threatening the industry’s growth.</p>
<h3><strong>Conclusion: A Need for Legislative Reform</strong></h3>
<p>Louisiana’s new THC law highlights a disconnect between lawmakers and the realities of the cannabis industry. Without more collaboration and informed decision-making, businesses and consumers will continue to suffer the consequences of poorly conceived regulations.</p>
<p>As the January 1 deadline looms, businesses are racing against time to adapt. Whether through clearance sales or complete operational overhauls, Louisiana’s hemp industry is bracing for impact.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-thc-law-brings-big-changes-for-businesses-in-2025/">Louisiana THC Law Brings Big Changes for Businesses in 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/louisiana-thc-law-brings-big-changes-for-businesses-in-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199824</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Texas Bill Aims to Legalize Recreational Marijuana with Limits</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-bill-aims-to-legalize-recreational-marijuana-with-limits/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-bill-aims-to-legalize-recreational-marijuana-with-limits/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis reform]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[decriminalization]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[recreational cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199816</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Could Texas Legalize Recreational Marijuana? A New Bill Sparks Debate Texas may soon follow 24 other states in legalizing recreational marijuana if a newly filed bill passes in the next legislative session. Filed by State Rep. Jessica Gonzalez (D-Dallas) in November, the bill seeks to establish a framework for adult use while implementing specific limitations. […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-bill-aims-to-legalize-recreational-marijuana-with-limits/">Texas Bill Aims to Legalize Recreational Marijuana with Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Could Texas Legalize Recreational Marijuana? A New Bill Sparks Debate</strong></h3>
<p>Texas may soon follow 24 other states in legalizing recreational marijuana if a newly filed bill passes in the next legislative session. Filed by State Rep. Jessica Gonzalez (D-Dallas) in November, the <a href="https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01208I.htm">bill</a> seeks to establish a framework for adult use while implementing specific limitations.</p>
<h3><strong>What Does the Bill Propose?</strong></h3>
<p>The bill would allow adults aged 21 and older to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Possess, use, and transport marijuana for personal use, up to <strong>2.5 ounces</strong>.</li>
<li>Store up to <strong>10 ounces</strong> of marijuana legally in a secure location.</li>
</ul>
<p>Cannabis products would be required to feature <strong>clear labeling</strong> and <strong>child-resistant packaging</strong> to enhance safety.</p>
<p>If passed, the bill would go into effect <strong>on September 1, 2025</strong>, following the legislative session that runs from <strong>January 5 to June 2, 2025</strong>.</p>
<p>However, limitations would remain in place:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Public smoking of marijuana</strong> would still be illegal.</li>
<li>Smoking in vehicles on public roads would also be prohibited.</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Texas and the Road to Legalization</strong></h3>
<p>This <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-rep-jessica-gonzalez-pushes-for-recreational-cannabis-legalization/">proposal</a> aligns Texas with the growing national trend. Currently, 24 states have legalized recreational marijuana, while 38 states permit medical marijuana use. Texas first entered the medical marijuana space in <strong>2015</strong> through its <strong>Compassionate Use Program</strong>, which remains one of the most restrictive programs in the country.</p>
<h3><strong>Barriers to Passage</strong></h3>
<p>Despite the progressive nature of the bill, its chances of passing remain slim. Texas leadership has historically pushed back against marijuana reform. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who has significant sway over Senate priorities, has already taken steps to <strong>restrict marijuana access statewide</strong>.</p>
<p>In a recent move, Patrick launched <strong>Senate Bill 3</strong>, which would ban all consumable tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products. The bill’s low filing number signals that it will be one of the first debated during the upcoming session.</p>
<h3><strong>The Dallas Decriminalization Movement</strong></h3>
<p>The push for marijuana reform has been especially prominent in <strong>Dallas</strong>. In November, the city’s voters passed <strong>Proposition R</strong>, also known as the “Dallas Freedom Act,” with a <strong>67% majority</strong>. The measure:</p>
<ul>
<li>Prevents police from arresting or citing individuals for possessing up to <strong>4 ounces</strong> of cannabis, except in felony investigations involving violence or narcotics.</li>
<li>Prohibits officers from using the smell of cannabis as probable cause for searches.</li>
<li>Restricts city funds from being used to test cannabis-related substances.</li>
</ul>
<p>Dallas had previously been one of the largest cities in the U.S. yet to decriminalize cannabis.</p>
<h3><strong>State Attorney General Pushback</strong></h3>
<p>Despite the public’s support for decriminalization, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched legal battles against cities like Dallas. Shortly after Proposition R passed, Paxton filed a lawsuit targeting the measure. This adds Dallas to a growing list of Texas cities facing state-level resistance over marijuana reform.</p>
<h3><strong>What’s Next for Texas Marijuana Legislation?</strong></h3>
<p>The bill represents a significant step in the ongoing conversation about marijuana reform in Texas. While it faces an uphill battle in the conservative-dominated legislature, public opinion in cities like Dallas indicates a growing shift toward legalization.</p>
<p>If passed, the bill could signal a major change in Texas’ approach to cannabis, balancing regulated access with clear limitations to address public safety concerns. For now, advocates and opponents alike will watch closely as the legislative session begins in January 2025.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-bill-aims-to-legalize-recreational-marijuana-with-limits/">Texas Bill Aims to Legalize Recreational Marijuana with Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/texas-bill-aims-to-legalize-recreational-marijuana-with-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199816</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Florida Lawmaker Explores Homegrown After Amendment 3 Fails</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-lawmaker-explores-homegrown-after-amendment-3-fails/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-lawmaker-explores-homegrown-after-amendment-3-fails/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Alex Andrade]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Amendment 3]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis legalization]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Florida cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[homegrown marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[marijuana reform]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199737</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Florida’s cannabis landscape has entered an intriguing chapter. Following the narrow failure of Amendment 3, one lawmaker has expressed interest in introducing a homegrown marijuana bill. While voters rejected the proposed constitutional amendment, citing concerns about public consumption and corporate influence, discussions around personal cultivation are gaining traction. Why Amendment 3 Failed Amendment 3 was […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-lawmaker-explores-homegrown-after-amendment-3-fails/">Florida Lawmaker Explores Homegrown After Amendment 3 Fails</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida’s cannabis landscape has entered an intriguing chapter. Following the narrow <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/4-states-on-the-ballot-for-cannabis-legalization-tuesdays-results/">failure</a> of Amendment 3, one lawmaker has expressed interest in introducing a homegrown marijuana bill. While voters rejected the proposed constitutional amendment, citing concerns about public consumption and corporate influence, discussions around personal cultivation are gaining traction.</p>
<h2>Why Amendment 3 Failed</h2>
<p>Amendment 3 was framed as a step toward cannabis reform but failed to convince Florida voters. The proposal, which sought to legalize recreational marijuana, required 60% approval but garnered only 55.9%. Critics, including Governor Ron DeSantis, described the amendment as deceptive, suggesting it favored large cannabis corporations over individual freedoms.</p>
<p>DeSantis referred to the initiative as the work of a “mega marijuana CEO” who poured $141 million into the campaign. According to him, the measure would have essentially created a “weed cartel,” allowing corporations to monopolize the market while limiting consumer rights.</p>
<h3>Key Concerns Raised:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>No home cultivation:</strong> Individuals wouldn’t be allowed to grow their own cannabis plants.</li>
<li><strong>High possession limits:</strong> Smoking up to three ounces of marijuana—roughly 100 joints—was deemed excessive compared to other states like California and Colorado.</li>
<li><strong>Public consumption loopholes:</strong> The amendment lacked explicit restrictions on smoking marijuana in public, leading to fears of widespread, unregulated use.</li>
</ul>
<p>Sheriff Bill Prummell, President of the Florida Sheriffs Association, applauded the amendment’s rejection, citing safety concerns. “Sheriffs trusted the judgment of Floridians to reject this hazardous amendment,” he said, calling it a victory for the state’s communities and children.</p>
<h2>A New Direction: Homegrown Cannabis</h2>
<p>In light of Amendment 3’s failure, Representative Alex Andrade is exploring the possibility of a homegrown marijuana bill. This would allow Floridians to cultivate cannabis for personal use, marking a significant departure from the corporate-driven model proposed in the amendment.</p>
<p>“I’d be very open to the idea of doing something like homegrown marijuana or personal consumption at home,” Andrade told the <em>Miami Herald</em>. He emphasized the need to gauge public reception before moving forward.</p>
<h3>Benefits of Homegrown Cannabis</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Consumer empowerment:</strong> Individuals gain control over their cannabis use without relying on commercial entities.</li>
<li><strong>Cost savings:</strong> Growing cannabis at home could be more affordable than purchasing from dispensaries.</li>
<li><strong>Transparency:</strong> Home cultivation eliminates concerns about additives or contaminants in commercially produced cannabis.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Challenges Ahead</h2>
<p>While the idea of homegrown cannabis appeals to many, it is not without hurdles. Opponents argue that it could lead to enforcement difficulties and unregulated markets. Additionally, Florida’s political climate remains divided on marijuana legalization, with influential groups like the Florida Sheriffs Association staunchly opposed to recreational use.</p>
<p>Governor DeSantis has also shown resistance to broader legalization efforts, suggesting that homegrown legislation might face significant scrutiny.</p>
<h2>The Path Forward</h2>
<p>Despite Amendment 3’s failure, the debate surrounding cannabis in Florida is far from over. Public support for marijuana reform continues to grow, with many advocating for a more inclusive and transparent approach.</p>
<p>A homegrown cannabis bill could strike a balance between individual freedoms and regulatory oversight, addressing concerns about corporate influence while keeping public safety in focus.</p>
<h3>Will Florida Lead the Way?</h3>
<p>Florida’s approach to cannabis regulation could set a precedent for other states grappling with similar issues. As the conversation evolves, lawmakers and voters alike will play a crucial role in shaping the state’s future.</p>
<p>For now, one thing is clear: Florida’s cannabis journey is just beginning.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-lawmaker-explores-homegrown-after-amendment-3-fails/">Florida Lawmaker Explores Homegrown After Amendment 3 Fails</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/florida-lawmaker-explores-homegrown-after-amendment-3-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199737</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>New Minnesota Law Bans Cannabis Smoking in Apartments</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-minnesota-law-bans-cannabis-smoking-in-apartments/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-minnesota-law-bans-cannabis-smoking-in-apartments/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Apartment living]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis regulations]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis smoking ban]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Health and safety]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Indoor air quality]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Medical cannabis exemption]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Minnesota cannabis law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Multifamily housing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[State Laws]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199349</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota has recently implemented a significant change to its cannabis consumption laws, aimed at protecting residents in multifamily housing from the impacts of secondhand cannabis smoke. This new regulation, effective from July 1, bans the smoking and vaping of cannabis in apartment buildings, with an important exception for medical cannabis users. Understanding the New Law […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-minnesota-law-bans-cannabis-smoking-in-apartments/">New Minnesota Law Bans Cannabis Smoking in Apartments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota has recently implemented a significant change to its cannabis consumption <a href="https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF4757&type=ccr&session=ls93&version=0">laws</a>, aimed at protecting residents in multifamily housing from the impacts of secondhand cannabis smoke. This new regulation, effective from July 1, bans the smoking and vaping of cannabis in apartment buildings, with an important exception for medical cannabis users.</p>
<h3>Understanding the New Law</h3>
<p>Under the updated state law, owners of multifamily housing must prohibit the smoking and vaping of cannabis within their properties. This change was initially slated for March 2025 but was brought forward to address logistical issues and to synchronize with other regulatory updates. The ban includes private units, balconies, and patios, aligning with existing indoor clean air laws that already restrict tobacco and cannabis smoking in common areas like lobbies and hallways.</p>
<p>However, the law provides a crucial exemption for medical cannabis users. Those registered with Minnesota’s medical cannabis program and possessing a valid medical card can continue to smoke or vape cannabis in their apartments. This exception acknowledges the necessity for some patients to use cannabis in smokable or vapable forms for medical relief.</p>
<h3>Rationale Behind the Ban</h3>
<p>The push for this restriction came from Sen. Ron Latz, who highlighted the health and nuisance concerns associated with cannabis smoke in enclosed buildings. Cannabis smoke, according to Latz, tends to infiltrate spaces more persistently than tobacco smoke, posing a significant issue for other residents. Despite these concerns, Latz supported the exemption for medical users, understanding the importance of cannabis as a medication for many patients.</p>
<p>Sen. Lindsey Port, a primary sponsor of the law, emphasized the need to protect medical patients who rely on specific forms of cannabis for their treatment. Different patients require different forms of cannabis, and for some, smokable or vapable products are essential. The law aims to balance the need to safeguard public health with the necessity of ensuring access to medical treatments.</p>
<h3>Enforcement and Compliance</h3>
<p>The law stipulates that any violation of the smoking and vaping ban in multifamily housing is subject to a civil administrative fine of $250. Apartment owners and managers are now required to enforce these rules, ensuring that residents comply with the new regulations.</p>
<p>Residents can still possess cannabis in their apartments and use non-smokable forms like edibles. Additionally, growing cannabis plants within the legal limits is likely permissible, provided they comply with the state’s guidelines.</p>
<h3>Potential Conflicts and Future Considerations</h3>
<p>While the law aims to reduce the nuisance and health risks associated with secondhand cannabis smoke, it also recognizes that conflicts may arise in multifamily buildings. Sen. Port noted that it is too early to determine the extent of these issues, given Minnesota’s relatively small medical cannabis population. The state law also includes provisions to prevent exposure to minors, ensuring that medical cannabis consumption does not affect nonpatient minors.</p>
<p>As the new regulations take effect, ongoing monitoring and adjustments may be necessary to address any emerging conflicts and ensure the law’s effectiveness in protecting public health while respecting medical needs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-minnesota-law-bans-cannabis-smoking-in-apartments/">New Minnesota Law Bans Cannabis Smoking in Apartments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-minnesota-law-bans-cannabis-smoking-in-apartments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199349</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>GOP-Led Committee Blocks Cannabis Rescheduling Efforts</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/gop-led-committee-blocks-cannabis-rescheduling-efforts/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/gop-led-committee-blocks-cannabis-rescheduling-efforts/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 20:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Appropriations Bill]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Amendments]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Protection]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Controlled Substances Act]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Federal Cannabis Policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Hemp Research]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[marijuana policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Rescheduling]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[State Laws]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199252</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pushback on cannabis rescheduling, while expected, has begun in full force. A Republican-controlled congressional committee this week unveiled a key spending bill that would block rescheduling and modify longstanding protections for state medical cannabis programs. This controversial move has ignited significant debate within the industry and among lawmakers. Key Provisions in the Appropriations Bill The […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/gop-led-committee-blocks-cannabis-rescheduling-efforts/">GOP-Led Committee Blocks Cannabis Rescheduling Efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushback on cannabis <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/dea-opens-up-public-comment-on-cannabis-rescheduling/">rescheduling</a>, while expected, has begun in full force. A Republican-controlled congressional committee this week unveiled a key spending <a href="https://appropriations.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-appropriations.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/fy25-cjs-subcommittee-bill-summary.pdf?_gl=1%2Anzn5k5%2A_ga%2AMTM2NzA5MTcwOC4xNzE5MzE2ODYw">bill</a> that would block rescheduling and modify longstanding protections for state medical cannabis programs. This controversial move has ignited significant debate within the industry and among lawmakers.</p>
<h3>Key Provisions in the Appropriations Bill</h3>
<p>The provisions were part of the 2025 appropriations bill for Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, which made it out of a subcommittee markup, according to a Wednesday <a href="https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/rogers-cole-fy25-commerce-justice-science-and-related-agencies-act-subcommittee">news release</a>. The bill stipulates that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is prohibited from using funds to reschedule or deschedule marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act.</p>
<p>The bill specifically states: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to reschedule marijuana … or to remove marijuana from the schedules established under section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act.” This provision signals ongoing disagreements in Congress about cannabis policy and its future in the United States.</p>
<h3>Impact on State Medical Cannabis Programs</h3>
<p>The bill maintains the existing rule that prevents the DOJ from interfering with state medical marijuana laws. However, it adds a new provision allowing DOJ funds to enforce violations of 21 U.S.C. 860. This section relates to penalties for distributing controlled substances near schools (within 1,000 feet) and other protected locations. In essence, while the new rule doesn’t directly change the protection for state medical cannabis programs, it could give the federal government a way to take action in some situations, even in states with legal medical marijuana.</p>
<h3>Historical Context and New Restrictions</h3>
<p>While the medical cannabis protection rider has been in place since 2014, this marks the first time such restrictive provisions have been included in the base Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) bill, according to Marijuana Moment. The legislation also retains a separate rider preventing DOJ interference in state hemp research programs.</p>
<h3>Broader Legislative Implications</h3>
<p>A separate House committee on Wednesday blocked all cannabis-related amendments to three major spending bills, preventing floor votes on several cannabis policy proposals, Marijuana Moment reported. The House Rules Committee rejected amendments to the 2025 appropriations legislation for the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of State.</p>
<p>Among the blocked proposals were:</p>
<ul>
<li>A measure to ban certain federal agencies from testing job applicants for cannabis in states where it’s legal.</li>
<li>An amendment to prevent military branches from removing servicemembers solely for past nonviolent cannabis offenses.</li>
<li>A provision to stop border agents from seizing cannabis from state-licensed businesses.</li>
</ul>
<p>This follows the committee’s decision earlier this month to block a mix of cannabis amendments to a large defense bill, which kept language preventing military branches from testing recruits for the substance.</p>
<h3>Industry Reaction and Future Outlook</h3>
<p>The inclusion of these provisions in the 2025 appropriations bill has sparked intense debate and concern within the cannabis industry and among advocates. Many see this as a significant step backward in the efforts to reform cannabis laws and ensure the protection of state-legal cannabis operations.</p>
<p>Critics argue that these measures could undermine the progress made in recent years and create additional challenges for businesses operating in the legal cannabis market. On the other hand, supporters of the bill believe that it is necessary to maintain control and regulation over cannabis use and distribution, especially in proximity to schools and other protected areas.</p>
<p>As the bill moves forward, it will be crucial to monitor the ongoing discussions and potential modifications that could impact the final outcome. The future of cannabis rescheduling and broader policy reform remains uncertain, and stakeholders on all sides are preparing for a continued battle in Congress.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/gop-led-committee-blocks-cannabis-rescheduling-efforts/">GOP-Led Committee Blocks Cannabis Rescheduling Efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/gop-led-committee-blocks-cannabis-rescheduling-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199252</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Comprehensive Cannabis Reform: The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/comprehensive-cannabis-reform-the-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/comprehensive-cannabis-reform-the-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Bipartisan Support]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Booker]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[CAOA]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[economic impact]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Federal Reform]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[public safety]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[regulatory framework]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Schumer]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social justice]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Wyden]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=199129</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A New Era in Cannabis Legislation: The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act Pivotal Changes on the Horizon The reintroduction of the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (CAOA) by Senate Democrats marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding cannabis legislation in the United States. Coming on the heels of the Justice Department’s decision to […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/comprehensive-cannabis-reform-the-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act/">Comprehensive Cannabis Reform: The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>A New Era in Cannabis Legislation: The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act</h2>
<h3>Pivotal Changes on the Horizon</h3>
<p>The reintroduction of the <a href="https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/majority-leader-schumer-senate-finance-committee-chairman-ron-wyden-and-senator-booker-lead-reintroduction-of-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act-legislation-to-end-the-federal-prohibition-of-cannabis">Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (CAOA) by Senate Democrats</a> marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding cannabis legislation in the United States. Coming on the heels of the Justice Department’s decision to reschedule cannabis, this legislation underscores a transformative shift in federal drug policy aimed at aligning with the evolving public and political landscape.</p>
<h3>A Detailed Look at the CAOA</h3>
<p>The CAOA proposes to revolutionize the current cannabis prohibition framework by removing marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and establishing comprehensive regulatory mechanisms. Here’s what the legislation aims to implement:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/why-de-scheduling-cannabis-is-the-only-path-forward/">Descheduling of Cannabis</a>:</strong> The bill mandates the Attorney General to remove cannabis from the CSA within 180 days, fully legalizing it at the federal level.</li>
<li><strong>Taxation and Revenue:</strong> It introduces a federal excise tax on cannabis businesses, starting at 5% for smaller operations and escalating to 25% for larger enterprises over five years.</li>
<li><strong>Criminal Justice Reform:</strong> A cornerstone of the CAOA is the expungement of records for individuals with low-level federal cannabis offenses and provisions for those incarcerated for cannabis crimes to seek legal redress.</li>
<li><strong>Regulatory Framework:</strong> Oversight of the cannabis industry would be divided among several federal agencies, including the FDA, ATF, and TTB, ensuring comprehensive governance from production to sale.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Road Ahead</h3>
<p>While the bill faces significant hurdles, especially in a divided Congress, its reintroduction by Senators Schumer, Wyden, and Booker, along with 18 original cosponsors, is a testament to the growing momentum for change. The CAOA is not just about legalization but also about rectifying past injustices, particularly in communities of color that have disproportionately suffered under previous drug laws.</p>
<h3>The Opposition and Critique</h3>
<p>Despite broad support, there are voices of caution, such as those from Shaleen Title, who warn of potential market consolidation that could sideline smaller and minority-owned businesses. This criticism underscores the need for careful legislative and regulatory crafting to prevent domination by large, established players.</p>
<h3>A Call for Comprehensive Reform</h3>
<p>Senator Schumer emphasized that the CAOA represents a “comprehensive and necessary update” to federal cannabis policies. It’s a bold call to move beyond piecemeal reforms and address the issue at a systemic level, ensuring safety, fairness, and economic opportunity.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act is more than legislation; it’s a potential catalyst for sweeping change across the societal, judicial, and economic landscapes of America. As discussions progress and the nation watches, the coming months will be crucial in shaping the future of cannabis policy in the United States.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/comprehensive-cannabis-reform-the-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act/">Comprehensive Cannabis Reform: The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/comprehensive-cannabis-reform-the-cannabis-administration-and-opportunity-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199129</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>D.C. Council Enacts Penalties for Unlicensed Cannabis Shops</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/d-c-council-enacts-penalties-for-unlicensed-cannabis-shops/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/d-c-council-enacts-penalties-for-unlicensed-cannabis-shops/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Mills]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[ABCA]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis sales]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Civil Enforcement]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[community involvement]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[D.C. Council]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Emergency Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Legal Framework]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Regulation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Market Regulation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[unlicensed shops]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=198938</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction In a landmark decision, the D.C. Council has unanimously passed emergency legislation targeting unlicensed cannabis gifting shops. This move marks a significant shift in the District’s approach to marijuana regulation, fundamentally altering the landscape of cannabis commerce in the city. The New Legislation: A Bold Step Forward Expanding Medical Marijuana Program In 2022, the […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/d-c-council-enacts-penalties-for-unlicensed-cannabis-shops/">D.C. Council Enacts Penalties for Unlicensed Cannabis Shops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Introduction</h3>
<p>In a landmark decision, the D.C. Council has unanimously passed emergency legislation targeting unlicensed cannabis gifting shops. This move marks a significant shift in the District’s approach to marijuana regulation, fundamentally altering the landscape of cannabis commerce in the city.</p>
<h3>The New Legislation: A Bold Step Forward</h3>
<h4>Expanding Medical Marijuana Program</h4>
<p>In 2022, the D.C. Council expanded the medical marijuana program, removing the cap on dispensaries. This expansion opened doors for cannabis gifting shops to transition into the legal market. These shops, where customers can purchase items like stickers or t-shirts and receive cannabis as a “gift”, have been a subject of regulatory ambiguity.</p>
<h4>Enforcing Regulations</h4>
<p>The new legislation imposes civil enforcement on gifting shops that fail to apply or qualify for the medical cannabis program. This introduces a framework similar to the one governing liquor licenses, creating a more structured and regulated market.</p>
<h3>Addressing Grey Market Challenges</h3>
<h4>Tackling Ambiguities</h4>
<p>Councilmember Charles Allen spearheaded the emergency legislation, addressing the grey area in cannabis regulation. With ambiguous responsibilities among governmental agencies, this law authorizes the Alcohol Beverage and Cannabis Administration (ABCA) to manage enforcement effectively.</p>
<h4>Controversial yet Necessary Measures</h4>
<p>The imposition of steep fines has stirred controversy, particularly regarding its impact on local Black and brown business owners. However, the Council believes that these measures are necessary to ensure a fair and legal marketplace.</p>
<h3>The Role of ABCA</h3>
<h4>Accepting Applications</h4>
<p>ABCA began accepting applications from unlicensed establishments in November, with a deadline set for January 29. To date, 37 businesses have applied, showcasing a positive response to the legal pathway offered.</p>
<h4>Inspection and Enforcement</h4>
<p>The bill grants ABCA and the D.C. police department authority to inspect records and seize illegally sold cannabis. This joint effort underscores the seriousness with which the city is approaching this issue.</p>
<h3>The Broader Impact</h3>
<h4>Economic Implications</h4>
<p>Gifting shops, suspected of generating over $600 million in sales annually, are now facing a new reality. This legislation could significantly reshape the economic landscape of cannabis sales in D.C.</p>
<h4>Legal and Social Considerations</h4>
<p>Initiative 71, passed in 2014, allowed the possession and gifting of marijuana in small amounts but did not address commercial sales. The new legislation attempts to fill this gap, balancing regulatory needs with social considerations.</p>
<h3>Community Involvement and Future Steps</h3>
<h4>Encouraging Local Input</h4>
<p>The bill empowers Advisory Neighborhood Commissions to participate in the licensing process, ensuring community voices are heard. This inclusion mirrors the practices in liquor licensing and aims to bring greater transparency to the process.</p>
<h4>Looking Ahead</h4>
<p>While this emergency bill takes immediate effect upon Mayor Muriel Bowser’s signature, Councilmember Allen aims for permanent legislation, fostering a more inclusive and legally sound framework.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The D.C. Council’s decisive action represents a pivotal moment in cannabis regulation. By addressing the complexities of the unlicensed cannabis market, the Council is paving the way for a safer, more equitable, and legally compliant cannabis industry in the District.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/d-c-council-enacts-penalties-for-unlicensed-cannabis-shops/">D.C. Council Enacts Penalties for Unlicensed Cannabis Shops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/d-c-council-enacts-penalties-for-unlicensed-cannabis-shops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198938</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Thailand’s Shift: Banning Recreational Cannabis Use</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-shift-banning-recreational-cannabis-use/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-shift-banning-recreational-cannabis-use/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 01:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis decriminalization]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Stores]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[drug policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Health Regulation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Legal Amendment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[medical cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[recreational use]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[THC regulation]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=198932</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction In a surprising turn, Thailand, a trailblazer in Southeast Asia for cannabis decriminalization, is set to ban recreational cannabis use. This new direction comes as the country’s recently elected government proposes amendments to the existing cannabis legislation. The Rising Tide of Cannabis Stores Post-decriminalization in 2022, Thailand witnessed a boom in cannabis stores. However, […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-shift-banning-recreational-cannabis-use/">Thailand’s Shift: Banning Recreational Cannabis Use</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Introduction</h3>
<p>In a surprising turn, Thailand, a trailblazer in Southeast Asia for cannabis decriminalization, is set to ban recreational cannabis use. This new direction comes as the country’s <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-new-pm-backpedals-on-recreational-use/">recently elected government</a> proposes amendments to the existing cannabis legislation.</p>
<h3>The Rising Tide of Cannabis Stores</h3>
<p>Post-decriminalization in 2022, Thailand witnessed a boom in cannabis stores. However, this growth came without stringent regulations, leading to concerns over unchecked recreational usage. The new bill, signed by Health Minister <a href="https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2719421">Cholnan</a> Srikaew, aims to steer cannabis usage back towards medical purposes only.</p>
<h3>The Proposed Legislation: A Closer Look</h3>
<p>The core of the proposed legislation revolves around restricting cannabis use to medical applications. It specifies that authorized stores can sell only legally permitted parts of the cannabis plant, potentially excluding THC-rich flowers. This move signifies a significant pivot from the open policy that prevailed post-decriminalization.</p>
<h3>Medical Use and Law Enforcement</h3>
<p>A key aspect of the legislation is aiding law enforcement. By making products with over 0.2% THC illegal, it simplifies identifying and prosecuting recreational use. The exact requirements for purchasing medical cannabis, such as medical certificates, remain unclear in the proposal.</p>
<h3>Stakeholder Reaction and Political Dynamics</h3>
<p>The Thai Cannabis Future Writing Network has criticized the bill for lacking stakeholder consultation. This legislation comes under a government elected in the 2023 Thai general election, known for its opposition to recreational cannabis. This shift raises questions about the future of cannabis tourism and the domestic recreational market.</p>
<h3>The Future of Cannabis Regulation in Thailand</h3>
<p>As the bill moves to the Lower House for review, its final form and the strictness of the regulations are still in flux. The influence of former Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, a proponent of cannabis decriminalization, adds another layer of complexity to the future of cannabis policy in Thailand.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Thailand stands at a crossroads in its cannabis policy. While the government moves towards stricter regulations for recreational use, the evolving landscape reflects a broader debate on drug policy and public health. The world watches as Thailand navigates these uncharted waters.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-shift-banning-recreational-cannabis-use/">Thailand’s Shift: Banning Recreational Cannabis Use</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/thailands-shift-banning-recreational-cannabis-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198932</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Exploring the Surge in Out-of-State Applicants for Missouri Social-Equity Licenses</title>
<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/exploring-the-surge-in-out-of-state-applicants-for-missouri-social-equity-licenses/</link>
<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/exploring-the-surge-in-out-of-state-applicants-for-missouri-social-equity-licenses/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis consulting]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis industry]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Legislation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[cannabis regulation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Equity Officer Report]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[License Applications]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Licensing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Microbusiness Program]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Out-of-State Applicants]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Social Equity]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=198918</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction: A Surprising Trend in Cannabis Licensing In October, a surprising trend emerged in Missouri’s cannabis industry. More than 40% of applicants for the state’s social-equity marijuana licenses were from outside Missouri. This statistic, from the Division of Cannabis Regulation’s annual report, signals a significant shift in the landscape of cannabis licensing. Out-of-State Dominance A […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/exploring-the-surge-in-out-of-state-applicants-for-missouri-social-equity-licenses/">Exploring the Surge in Out-of-State Applicants for Missouri Social-Equity Licenses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Introduction: A Surprising Trend in Cannabis Licensing</strong></h3>
<p>In October, a surprising trend emerged in Missouri’s cannabis industry. More than 40% of applicants for the state’s social-equity marijuana licenses were from outside Missouri. This statistic, from the Division of Cannabis Regulation’s annual report, signals a significant shift in the landscape of cannabis licensing.</p>
<h3><strong>Out-of-State Dominance</strong></h3>
<p>A closer look reveals that half of these out-of-state owners hail from California, Michigan, Louisiana, and Arizona. These figures come from the microbusiness license applications, part of a broader initiative to boost industry opportunities in disadvantaged communities.</p>
<h3><strong>Microbusiness License Program: An Overview</strong></h3>
<p>The microbusiness license program, stemming from a constitutional amendment legalizing recreational marijuana, aimed to democratize industry access. With 1,625 applications for just 48 licenses, competition was fierce. The program’s design was to encourage local entrepreneurship, but the influx of out-of-state interest <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/missouri-naacp-threatens-legal-action-over-social-equity/">raises questions</a> about its reach and effectiveness.</p>
<h3><strong>Revocation and Compliance Challenges</strong></h3>
<p>The Division of Cannabis Regulation is now scrutinizing the legitimacy of some licensees. Eleven of the 48 licenses issued are under threat of revocation due to non-compliance with eligibility requirements. This strict oversight demonstrates the division’s commitment to integrity and fairness in the licensing process.</p>
<h3><strong>Case Studies: Canna Zoned and Cannabis Business Advisors</strong></h3>
<p>Canna Zoned, a Michigan-based company, secured two dispensary licenses now deemed ineligible. Their strategy, alongside Cannabis Business Advisors from Arizona, involved flooding the lottery with applications. This tactic, though initially successful, has since backfired, highlighting the need for stringent regulatory compliance.</p>
<h3><strong>Legal and Ethical Implications</strong></h3>
<p>The situation brings to light several legal and ethical considerations. The use of ‘flooding strategy’ by companies like Canna Zoned and Cannabis Business Advisors raises questions about the fairness and intent of the lottery system. It also underscores the importance of transparent and equitable licensing processes.</p>
<h3><strong>Learning from the First Round</strong></h3>
<p>Abigail Vivas, Chief Equity Officer, acknowledges the need for improvement. The division plans to introduce educational sessions and possibly a grant-funding program to support applicants. These initiatives aim to prevent predatory practices and foster a more equitable and accessible industry.</p>
<h3><strong>Conclusion: Building a Fairer Future</strong></h3>
<p>Missouri’s experience with out-of-state applicants for social-equity marijuana licenses offers valuable lessons. As the state prepares for its second round of applications, there’s a clear mandate for more robust support systems and stricter adherence to the program’s intended goals. A fair, transparent, and locally-focused cannabis industry remains the ultimate aim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/exploring-the-surge-in-out-of-state-applicants-for-missouri-social-equity-licenses/">Exploring the Surge in Out-of-State Applicants for Missouri Social-Equity Licenses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/exploring-the-surge-in-out-of-state-applicants-for-missouri-social-equity-licenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198918</post-id> </item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced{w3tc_pagecache_reject_reason}
Served from: blackcannabismagazine.com @ 2025-03-15 02:28:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->