<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Federal Lawsuit Archives &#8212; Black Cannabis Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/tag/federal-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/tag/federal-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>We educate, inform, empower + provide entertainment for our TRIBE. Highlighting people of color in the cannabis industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 23:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">169930730</site>	<item>
		<title>New CAURD Lawsuits: A Legal Hurdle for NY Cannabis Stores</title>
		<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-caurd-lawsuits-a-legal-hurdle-for-ny-cannabis-stores/</link>
					<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-caurd-lawsuits-a-legal-hurdle-for-ny-cannabis-stores/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Growers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAURD program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New CAURD lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY cannabis industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=198884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The New CAURD Lawsuits: A Stumbling Block for New York’s Cannabis Ambitions The budding cannabis industry in New York faces a new challenge with the emergence of the New CAURD Lawsuit, marking yet another legal hurdle that could significantly impact the opening of adult-use cannabis stores across the state. The Previous Settlement: A Brief Respite [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-caurd-lawsuits-a-legal-hurdle-for-ny-cannabis-stores/">New CAURD Lawsuits: A Legal Hurdle for NY Cannabis Stores</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The New CAURD Lawsuits: A Stumbling Block for New York’s Cannabis Ambitions</h3>
<p>The budding cannabis industry in New York faces a new challenge with the emergence of the New CAURD Lawsuit, marking yet another legal hurdle that could significantly impact the opening of adult-use cannabis stores across the state.</p>
<h3>The Previous Settlement: A Brief Respite</h3>
<p>Recently, New York regulators reached an <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/ny-caurd-settlement-key-shift-in-cannabis-licensing/">settlement</a> in principle with a group of disabled military veterans, temporarily resolving the Carmine Fiore v. New York State Cannabis Control Board lawsuit. This lawsuit had previously resulted in an injunction, halting the operation of over 400 Conditional Adult-Use Retail Dispensary (CAURD) licensees. The plaintiffs contended that the Office of Cannabis Management&#8217;s (OCM) approach to licensing, prioritizing individuals with marijuana-related offenses and their families, was unconstitutional.</p>
<h3>The Legal Conundrum: Variscite LLC&#8217;s Federal Case</h3>
<p>Variscite New York Four LLC and Variscite New York Five LLC have initiated a <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/694009909/Lawsuit-NY-Cannabis-1?secret_password=2fLSshlblhtNN2XRfg7h#fullscreen&amp;from_embed">federal lawsuit</a> against the state Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) and the Cannabis Control Board, coinciding with the closing of the application window for adult-use retail licenses. This New CAURD lawsuits raises questions about the state’s licensing process, particularly in its constitutional compliance.</p>
<h3>The Crux of the Dispute: Dormant Commerce Clause and Residency Requirements</h3>
<p>Central to the lawsuits is the accusation that New York’s licensing system, favoring state residents, violates the federal Dormant Commerce Clause. This clause plays a pivotal role in preventing states from implementing discriminatory legislation against interstate commerce. The plaintiffs argue that their exclusion, based on non-residency, constitutes a violation of this clause.</p>
<h3>Plaintiffs&#8217; Perspective: A Call for Equal Opportunities</h3>
<p>The companies behind the lawsuit, both owned by an individual with a prior marijuana conviction in California, seek inclusion in the &#8220;extra priority&#8221; pool of applicants. They contend that they meet all other criteria, with residency being the sole exception. This demand highlights the broader industry call for a more equitable and inclusive licensing process.</p>
<h3>OCM&#8217;s Stance: Silence Amidst Litigation</h3>
<p>In line with their policy, the Office of Cannabis Management has refrained from commenting on the lawsuit. This stance is in keeping with their approach to <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-yorks-caurd-licensing-legal-hurdles-ahead/">previous</a> legal challenges that have affected the state&#8217;s cannabis sector.</p>
<h3>Broader Impacts: The Plight of Local Cannabis Growers</h3>
<p>This legal standoff has far-reaching implications, particularly for local cannabis growers who face a glut of product with no legal retail outlets available. The issue underscores the cascading effects of legal hurdles on the state&#8217;s entire cannabis supply chain.</p>
<h3>Legislative Response: Seeking Sustainable Solutions</h3>
<p>Efforts to support the industry persist, exemplified by Senator Jeremy Cooney’s willingness to explore legislative options to enhance industry stability, such as making the Cannabis Grower Showcases a permanent feature.</p>
<h3>Conclusion: Navigating the Legal Maze</h3>
<p>As New York&#8217;s cannabis industry contends with the New CAURD lawsuits,  the delicate balance between regulatory compliance and industry support remains a critical consideration. The outcome of this lawsuit will be a determining factor in the trajectory of cannabis commerce in New York.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-caurd-lawsuits-a-legal-hurdle-for-ny-cannabis-stores/">New CAURD Lawsuits: A Legal Hurdle for NY Cannabis Stores</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/new-caurd-lawsuits-a-legal-hurdle-for-ny-cannabis-stores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198884</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi Dispensary Owner Lawsuit Over Ad Ban</title>
		<link>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-dispensary-owner-lawsuit-over-ad-ban/</link>
					<comments>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-dispensary-owner-lawsuit-over-ad-ban/?noamp=mobile#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazey Taughtme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 19:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispensary Owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blackcannabismagazine.com/?p=198806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction : A Mississippi Dispensary Lawsuit In Olive Branch, Mississippi, a groundbreaking lawsuit has erupted. Clarence Cocroft, owner of Tru Source Medical Cannabis, has partnered with the Institute for Justice (IJ) to challenge state regulations restricting his right to advertise his legal business. This case is not just about a dispensary&#8217;s struggle but a fight [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-dispensary-owner-lawsuit-over-ad-ban/">Mississippi Dispensary Owner Lawsuit Over Ad Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Introduction : A Mississippi Dispensary Lawsuit</h3>
<p>In Olive Branch, Mississippi, a groundbreaking <a href="https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Doc.-1-Complaint-for-Declaratory-and-Injunctive-Relief.pdf">lawsuit</a> has erupted. Clarence Cocroft, owner of Tru Source Medical Cannabis, has partnered with the Institute for Justice (IJ) to challenge state regulations restricting his right to advertise his legal business. This case is not just about a dispensary&#8217;s struggle but a fight for the First Amendment rights of all.</p>
<h3>The Spark of Controversy</h3>
<p>Tru Source, Mississippi&#8217;s first Black-owned dispensary, opened its doors in 2023. Despite the overwhelming support for medical marijuana, Cocroft faced a significant hurdle: strict advertising regulations. Tucked away in an industrial park, Tru Source&#8217;s visibility was severely limited. &#8220;Not being able to advertise has made reaching patients almost impossible,&#8221; Cocroft laments.</p>
<h3>The First Amendment at Stake</h3>
<p>Cocroft&#8217;s struggle represents a larger issue: the right to free speech. &#8220;Preventing someone from advertising their legal business violates the First Amendment,&#8221; argues IJ Senior Attorney Ari Bargil. The lawsuit questions whether states can restrict speech related to medical marijuana, even when it&#8217;s legal under state law and the federal government has opted not to enforce its prohibition.</p>
<h3>The Extent of Restrictions</h3>
<p>Mississippi&#8217;s Department of Health (DOH) wields considerable power in regulating dispensary advertising. Dispensaries like Tru Source are barred from utilizing media channels for advertising, confined only to signage on their property and limited web presence. This restrictive approach stands in stark contrast to less burdensome regulations in other states with legal medical marijuana.</p>
<h3>The Broader Implications</h3>
<p>Mississippi isn&#8217;t alone in imposing such restrictions. Neighboring states like Arkansas, Louisiana, and Alabama have similar laws. While all states with legal medical marijuana prohibit misleading advertising and targeting children, Mississippi&#8217;s restrictions are notably more stringent.</p>
<h3>The Legal Battle Ahead</h3>
<p>IJ&#8217;s involvement signifies the importance of this legal battle. The organization, known for defending business owners&#8217; rights to truthful product discussion, views Cocroft&#8217;s case as pivotal. &#8220;The state cannot authorize legal sales while forbidding truthful advertising,&#8221; says IJ Attorney Katrin Marquez.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Cocroft&#8217;s Mississippi Dispensary Lawsuit embodies more than a fight for his business. It&#8217;s a battle for the fundamental right of free speech, challenging the state&#8217;s ability to restrict lawful businesses from informing the public. This case could set a precedent, not just in <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-inmate-doing-life-sentence-over-weed-conviction-and-habitual-offender-law/">Mississippi</a> but across the United States, about the extent of state power over the advertising rights of legal businesses.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-dispensary-owner-lawsuit-over-ad-ban/">Mississippi Dispensary Owner Lawsuit Over Ad Ban</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blackcannabismagazine.com">Black Cannabis Magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blackcannabismagazine.com/mississippi-dispensary-owner-lawsuit-over-ad-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198806</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced{w3tc_pagecache_reject_reason}

Served from: blackcannabismagazine.com @ 2025-02-20 16:33:14 by W3 Total Cache
-->